Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 27 June 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 115


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 27 JUNE 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Dean Rodney Scott
Darren Andrew Berry

For Bail Consent
Matthew John Townsend

For Trial
Kurt Stanley James
Aaron James Crosswell
(Part heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
Voire Dire
IPP
(Part Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter  

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Mark Anthony Carr

4.15pm For Sentence
Alyssa Jane Kettle

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Evans

Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Hearing
Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited  v.  Robyn Joan Rourke

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Blow

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
FOR MENTION
Paul Kevin Bartlett
HTWB
William Tyler Frame

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 27 June 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 115
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 115
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case summary pertains to court lists from the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Magistrates Court, and the Law Lists for Wednesday, 27 June 2012. The court lists include various cases scheduled for mention, bail, trial, and sentencing. The case of particular interest involves a civil dispute between Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited and Robyn Joan Rourke, which was scheduled for a hearing in Burnie.

The legal issues in this case would likely revolve around the terms and conditions of a trust or estate, with the court needing to interpret and apply relevant laws to resolve any disputes between the parties. The court would need to consider evidence presented by both parties and apply legal principles to determine the outcome. The reasoning of the court would depend on the specific details of the case, including the nature of the trust or estate, the rights and obligations of the parties involved, and any relevant legal precedents.

The outcome of the case would depend on the court's interpretation of the law and the evidence presented. If the court finds in favour of the plaintiffs, Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited, the court may order the defendant, Robyn Joan Rourke, to take certain actions or pay damages. Alternatively, if the court finds in favour of the defendant, the plaintiffs' claims would be dismissed, and any orders or damages sought by the plaintiffs would not be granted. The final orders of the court would be based on its determination of the legal issues and the evidence presented in the case.

In summary, the case summary provides a brief overview of the court lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Magistrates Court, and the Law Lists for Wednesday, 27 June 2012. The case of particular interest involves a civil dispute between Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited and Robyn Joan Rourke, which was scheduled for a hearing in Burnie. The legal issues in this case would likely revolve around the terms and conditions of a trust or estate, with the court needing to interpret and apply relevant laws to resolve any disputes between the parties. The outcome of the case would depend on the court's interpretation of the law and the evidence presented.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.