SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 27 JUNE 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Dean Rodney Scott
Darren Andrew Berry
For Bail Consent
Matthew John Townsend
For Trial
Kurt Stanley James
Aaron James Crosswell
(Part heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
Voire Dire
IPP
(Part Heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Mark Anthony Carr
4.15pm For Sentence
Alyssa Jane Kettle
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Evans
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Hearing
Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited v. Robyn Joan Rourke
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
FOR MENTION
Paul Kevin Bartlett
HTWB
William Tyler Frame
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 27 June 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 115
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 115
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in this case would likely revolve around the terms and conditions of a trust or estate, with the court needing to interpret and apply relevant laws to resolve any disputes between the parties. The court would need to consider evidence presented by both parties and apply legal principles to determine the outcome. The reasoning of the court would depend on the specific details of the case, including the nature of the trust or estate, the rights and obligations of the parties involved, and any relevant legal precedents.
The outcome of the case would depend on the court's interpretation of the law and the evidence presented. If the court finds in favour of the plaintiffs, Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited, the court may order the defendant, Robyn Joan Rourke, to take certain actions or pay damages. Alternatively, if the court finds in favour of the defendant, the plaintiffs' claims would be dismissed, and any orders or damages sought by the plaintiffs would not be granted. The final orders of the court would be based on its determination of the legal issues and the evidence presented in the case.
In summary, the case summary provides a brief overview of the court lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Magistrates Court, and the Law Lists for Wednesday, 27 June 2012. The case of particular interest involves a civil dispute between Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited and Robyn Joan Rourke, which was scheduled for a hearing in Burnie. The legal issues in this case would likely revolve around the terms and conditions of a trust or estate, with the court needing to interpret and apply relevant laws to resolve any disputes between the parties. The outcome of the case would depend on the court's interpretation of the law and the evidence presented.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.