SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 27 APRIL 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Cleophas Turagendanwa
For Trial
Aaron Roy Johnston
(Part Heard)
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Robert Dumarchand
v
Bernadette Woods
Criminal Jurisdiction
To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Robyn Diane Cotton
Jane Gluschke
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Aaron Leonard Townsend
(Part Heard)
In Court as in Chambers
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Joshua James Lee
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Adam Maxwell Cox
10:00am
For Trial (Empanelment only)
Cameron John Capodici
4:15pm
For Further Submissions and Sentence
Ty Scott Hammond
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Gavin Richard Baldwin
2:00 p.m.
For Remand
Benjamin James Wright
4:15 p.m.
For Ruling
Christina Vernessa Watson
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 27 April 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 82
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 82
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court varied significantly, encompassing criminal directions hearings, ongoing trials, and civil judgments. In the criminal domain, the court was tasked with managing the procedural aspects of ongoing trials, ensuring that both the prosecution and defence had the opportunity to present their cases. The court also needed to address bail applications and remand hearings to ensure that defendants were fairly treated while awaiting trial. In the civil domain, the court had to deliver a judgment in the case of Dumarchand v Woods, which would likely involve interpreting the relevant laws and applying them to the facts of the case. Each case presented unique challenges that required careful consideration of the applicable legal principles and procedures.
The Supreme Court of Tasmania demonstrated its efficiency and commitment to justice by handling a diverse array of cases. The court managed to address both criminal and civil matters, ensuring that all defendants and plaintiffs received fair treatment. The outcomes of these hearings and trials would depend on the specifics of each case, including the evidence presented and the arguments made by both parties. The court's ability to schedule and manage these cases efficiently was indicative of its role in maintaining the judicial system's integrity and ensuring timely justice for all involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.