SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 26 SEPTEMBER 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
REH
For Trial
Tony Matthew White
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Michael John Gardner
(Part Heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Adam James Walker
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Blow
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Hearing
Colin Finch v. Peter Smith
BURNIE
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Mark Adrian Wicks
Justin James Browne
Luke Anthony Abraham
For Trial (part-heard)
Tristan James Hanson
Kylie Wise
4.15 pm
For Sentence
Via Video-Link to Court 8, Hobart
Luke David Buck
DEVONPORT MAGISTRATES COURT
Court 2, 8 Griffith Street before Associate Justice Holt
Civil Jurisdiction
10.30 AM
FOR TRIAL
Handley v Hindley & Anor
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 26 September 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 186
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 186
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with resolving a range of legal issues across different cases, including the validity and admissibility of evidence in criminal trials, the interpretation of civil contracts, and the sentencing implications of various criminal offences. Each case presented unique legal questions that required the court's interpretation of relevant laws and application of legal principles.
The court provided detailed reasoning for each case, focusing on the specifics of the evidence presented, the interpretation of legal statutes, and the application of case law. In criminal cases, the court considered the principles of natural justice and the burden of proof. In civil cases, the focus was on contractual obligations and the remedies available under the law. The outcomes varied, with some cases resulting in verdicts, others in sentencing, and some requiring further hearings. The court ensured that justice was administered fairly and in accordance with the law.
Final orders included verdicts in some criminal cases, sentencing in others, and directives for further hearings in both civil and criminal matters. The court's decisions were communicated to the parties involved, and the outcomes were recorded for legal reference.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.