SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 26 JUNE 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Ronnie Edward Jackson
(Part Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Sentence
Joseph Michael Tullo
For Mention
Laurrance Nigel Kemp
Anne Marie Kemp
Athlene Mona Graham
Diane Mary Honey
MDM
Garry Scott Sullivan
Joshua Michael Murtagh
Todd Athol Jackson
Mathew Shane Hugo
Peter Norman Campbell
Peter Edward Kreiner
Leigh Reginald Dobson
JLF
Jyden John Kirkpatrick
BLH
Frederick Edward Petrasek
Luke William Garth
Jamie Reginald Hall
Ricky Shane Batt
For Plea
Corey Ronald Lomas
ALC
Assim Imad Mohamed
JMM
Nicole Anne Kennedy
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m. For Mention
Kade Michael Evans
For Sentencing Submissions
Rebecca Janice Maree Cordwell
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Kim Gregory White
2.15 p.m. For Sentence
Alan Robert Arkinstall
For Plea
Darren James Mason
BURNIE
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
10.00am For Mention
Benjamin John Bradshaw
Timothy Maurice Keith Deegan
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
JCS
2.15pm For Plea
Christopher Ernest Denman
For Application
Jason Robert Burns
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 26 June 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 110
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 110
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases varied significantly, from ongoing trials and part-heard cases to sentencing and mentions. The court's primary tasks included ensuring due process was followed in the trials and hearings, making sentencing decisions based on legal precedents and the circumstances of the crimes, and addressing any procedural applications or mentions that required judicial attention. Each case demanded careful consideration of both the facts and the relevant legal frameworks.
The reasoning and outcomes of the cases were not detailed in the document, but the court would have assessed evidence, legal arguments, and relevant statutes to reach its decisions. For instance, in the sentencing phase, the court would consider the severity of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. The final orders would depend on the specific circumstances of each case, including any sentences imposed, rulings on mentions, or directives for further proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.