Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 26 February 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 26 FEBRUARY 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Tamara Jayne Gallahar

For Trial
JGJ
ZSS
(Part-Heard)

4.00 p.m.
For mention
Patrick Stanley Daley
Nicholas Aaron Paul Cernigoi

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

For Trial
Stephen Garry George Devine
Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe
(Part-Heard)

Not Before 10:30 a.m.

For Mention
Christie-Lee Margaret Shaw
Jamie Peter Smart

For Plea
Cameron Desmond Heather
Brady John Magrath
Caleb Anthony Paul Woods
Jacob Anthony Burdon
Robert Maxwell Brown
Timothy Geoffrey Briers

For Facts and Sentence
Paul Fraser Catto

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application
Stuart Malcolm Allen

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Argument
Daniel Johnston Russell
v
Hongfei Chu

2:15 p.m.
For Decision
Adrian Doran Millington
v
Sergeant Richard Lane

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No Law List for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Daniel Johnston Russell v Hongfei Chu was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania's civil jurisdiction. The dispute involved claims brought by the plaintiff, Daniel Johnston Russell, against the defendant, Hongfei Chu, relating to matters that were not fully specified in the court lists. The hearing was presided over by Justice Wood.

The legal issues before the court centred on the claims made by the plaintiff against the defendant and the evidence presented to support these claims. The court was tasked with determining the validity of the plaintiff's assertions and the applicable legal principles in the context of the presented facts.

Justice Wood assessed the evidence and arguments presented by both parties and issued a decision in the case. The outcome of the decision was to be communicated at 2:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. No further details regarding the specific nature of the claims, the evidence, or the final decision are provided in the court lists.

The court did not provide final orders in the list, indicating that further information or a subsequent hearing may be required to finalise the case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established