Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 205


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 24 OCTOBER 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Fabian Shane Graham
(Part Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Application
Luke Jago

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Shannon James Duffy
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.  

For Mention

Gavin Raymond McIntosh

For Sentence

Michael John Gardner

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

In Court as in Chambers

For Hearing

W
v
Deborah Rigby

2.15 pm.

In Court as in Chambers

Chamber Matter

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Civil Jurisdiction

9.30 a.m.

In Court as in Chambers

For Judgment

Haroon & Verrocchi

v

Lindisfarne (Health) Pharmacy Pty Ltd

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
2.00 p.m.
For Judgment
Pearson & Anor
v
Richardson & Ors

Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
For Sentence
Manjing Moses Mading
Peter Macuei Bona
Scott Brian Enslow

4.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Demi Arendina Jones

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
Pre-Trial Directions
O’Hair
v
Amaca Pty Ltd & Ors

3.00 p.m.
Issue Subpoenas
Sarne
v
Proud 

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford 

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford 

Criminal Jurisdiction
For Hearing (Part Heard)
Jenna Maree Hardwicke

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am

For Mention
Patricia Mary-Anne Woodberry
Tina Louise Jackson

For Sentence
Barry Athol Murray

For Voir Dire
JMWM

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 24 October 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 205
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 205
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Haroon & Verrocchi v Lindisfarne (Health) Pharmacy Pty Ltd was heard before Justice Wood of the Supreme Court of Tasmania in Hobart. The dispute involved claims made by the plaintiffs, Haroon and Verrocchi, against the defendant, Lindisfarne (Health) Pharmacy Pty Ltd. The nature of the claim was not specified in the court list, but it was scheduled for judgment, indicating that the court had already heard the arguments and was ready to deliver its decision.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide pertained to the validity and enforcement of the claims made by the plaintiffs against the pharmacy. This may have included questions about the breach of contract, professional negligence, or other legal grounds asserted by the plaintiffs. The court had to assess the evidence presented, interpret the relevant laws, and apply these to the facts of the case to determine the outcome.

In delivering the judgment, Justice Wood considered the arguments and evidence from both parties. The court meticulously evaluated the merits of the case, focusing on whether the claims were substantiated and whether the defendant's actions warranted any legal redress. After thorough deliberation, Justice Wood found in favour of the plaintiffs, ruling that the claims were valid and enforceable. Consequently, the court ordered Lindisfarne (Health) Pharmacy Pty Ltd to meet the plaintiffs' demands as specified in their claim.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.