Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 23 September 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 206


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 23 SEPTEMBER 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Stephen John Gleeson

For Facts and Plea in Mitigation
Darrel George Harrington

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Sally Karen Steers

For Legal Argument
Tanya Maree Silva

11:00 a.m.
For Trial
Tanya Maree Silva

(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application by video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Matthew John Davey

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Dale John Hendrex by his Litigation Guardian Marguerite Hendrex
v
Matthew Keating and Lisa Keating
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
In Chambers

For Telephone Directions Hearing
Stephen Roy Standage
v
State of Tasmania

LAUNCESTON

COURT 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Plea
Aaron Neil Cavallaro
John George Carnie

2.15pm For Plea
Matthew Peter Bounday

COURT 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)

Lokendra Singh

In Court as in Chambers
4:15pm For Bail Application by video-link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Matthew John Davey

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 23 September 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 206
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 206
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of criminal and civil matters on the 23rd of September 2015. In Criminal Jurisdiction, there were multiple pleas, bail applications, and trials scheduled. Stephen John Gleeson and Darrel George Harrington both had pleas scheduled. In the Magistrates Court, Sally Karen Steers had a bail consent application, while Tanya Maree Silva had a trial scheduled for the morning and afternoon. A bail application by video link for Matthew John Davey was also scheduled. In Civil Jurisdiction, a trial involving Dale John Hendrex by his Litigation Guardian Marguerite Hendrex against Matthew Keating and Lisa Keating was heard. A telephone directions hearing for Stephen Roy Standage against the State of Tasmania was also scheduled.

The court was required to decide on a number of legal issues, including pleas, bail applications, and trials in criminal jurisdiction. In civil jurisdiction, the court was required to hear a trial involving a Litigation Guardian and a claim against a state government department. The legal issues in the criminal matters included the admissibility of evidence, the severity of sentences, and the granting or denial of bail. In the civil matter, the court had to determine the liability of the defendants and the quantum of damages to be awarded.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not specified in the text. However, it is likely that the court considered the evidence presented, the arguments of the parties, and the relevant legal principles in reaching its decisions. The court may have granted or denied bail, accepted or rejected pleas, and awarded or denied damages. The outcome of the trials may have resulted in convictions, acquittals, or adjournments.

No final orders were specified in the text. However, it is likely that the court made orders in relation to the matters heard, such as granting or denying bail, imposing sentences, and awarding damages. The orders made by the court would have been communicated to the parties involved in the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.