Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 23 October 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 23 OCTOBER 2013

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Tu Ai Lin
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m. via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Plea
DSG

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1:45 p.m. via video link from Court 1, Launceston
For Sentence
David John Charles King

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jamie Reginald Hall

Voir Dire
Stephen Roy Standage

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Decision
Michael Neil Shea
v
Sergeant Richard Lane

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Amend Statement of Claim
Roberts Limited
v
Frifth-Brown & Anor

2:15 p.m.
Set down for Trial
Masters
v
Dobson Mitchell & Allport & Anor

4:00 p.m.
Particulars via telephone
Constantine & Ors
v
Hanley

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Stephen John Peters

1.45pm For Sentence by Video-Link to Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
David John Charles King

4.15pm For Mention by Video-Link to Hobart Remand Centre
MDM
SWDM

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Loree Ramone Arabena v. Marcus Todman

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link
Adrian Wayne Smillie
Jacqueline Anne Welsh
Justin Roy John Roughley

For Mention
Daniel Reginald Clarke
Corey Bamber Brooke
David Clinton Johnson
ZRP
Jason Theo MacMillan
Ashlea Maree Rigby
Alan Robert Arkinstall

For Plea
Cameron Lewis Rawlinson

Not before 10:30 a.m.
For Trial (Part-heard)
JWB

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence via video-link
Christopher Luke Finn

4:15 p.m.
For Plea via video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
DSG

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves the Supreme Court of Tasmania's law lists for 23 October 2013. Various cases are listed for different stages of proceedings, including trials, pleas, sentencing, mentions, and decisions. The court's jurisdiction covers both criminal and civil matters. Notable cases include the continuation of the trial of Tu Ai Lin, sentencing of David John Charles King, and a civil matter between Michael Neil Sheav and Sergeant Richard Lane.

The legal issues in these cases encompass a range of criminal and civil matters. In criminal cases, issues such as the admissibility of evidence, sentencing principles, and the application of criminal law are central. In civil cases, the focus may be on the interpretation of contracts, the validity of claims, and the procedural aspects of litigation. The court must consider the evidence presented, applicable laws, and precedents to make informed decisions.

The court's reasoning and outcome in each case depend on the specific facts and legal principles involved. For instance, in the criminal cases, the court must evaluate the evidence to determine guilt or innocence and apply appropriate sentencing guidelines. In civil cases, the court must interpret the terms of agreements, assess the validity of claims, and rule on procedural matters. The court's decisions reflect a careful consideration of the evidence, legal arguments, and relevant statutes.

No specific final orders are mentioned in the document, but the outcomes will depend on the court's findings in each case. The decisions will address the legal issues raised and provide resolutions based on the evidence and applicable laws. The court's judgments will be communicated in written judgments or orders, which will be available for review by the parties involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established