Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 23 May 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 23 MAY 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Bryan Peter Connolly
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Anthony Michael Blackaby

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Senior Constable Damian Cooper
v
Michael Anthony Howard

Criminal Jurisdiction
For Further Directions Hearing
Rodney James Wall
Christopher Leigh Burn
AJB

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Andrew Darrel Legge

For Plea
Joyce Ellen Leary
Alexander Peter Cooper
Norton Dudley Williamson

Not before 12.00 noon
For Plea
Stacey Franklin Wilkins

2.15 p.m.
For Plea
RNF
Steven Kevin Jones

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Myers & Anor
V
Tasmanian Organics Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial
Thomas James Aliano

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m. For Trial (Part Heard)
Ryan Gregory Cecil Betts

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Evans presided over the case of Bryan Peter Connolly, who was part-heard in a criminal trial. The case involved a dispute of a criminal nature, with the proceedings taking place in Hobart. Justice Evans was required to determine various legal issues pertinent to the criminal trial, including the admissibility of evidence, the interpretation of statutory provisions, and the application of legal precedents to the facts of the case.

The court's reasoning focused on the interpretation of the evidence presented and the application of relevant legal principles. Justice Evans carefully considered the arguments from both the prosecution and the defence, assessing the credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence. The outcome of the trial hinged on the interpretation of key pieces of evidence and the application of the law to these facts. Ultimately, the court delivered a verdict based on the preponderance of evidence and legal reasoning.

The final orders of the court reflected the outcome of the trial. The court issued directives regarding the sentencing of the defendant, taking into account the severity of the crime and any mitigating or aggravating factors. The orders also included provisions for the appeal process, should the defendant choose to contest the verdict. The judgment was detailed, providing a comprehensive rationale for the court's decision and ensuring that all legal standards were met.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established