Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 22 June 2016

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 22 JUNE 2016

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Robyn Diane Cotton

(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.

For Sentence

Aaron Leonard Townsend

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Variation
GIM

In Court
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Adrian Eugene Kelleher
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
JMDB

In Court as In Chambers
Not before 3:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Joshua Lawrence Plummer
Eric Michael Benjamin

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Adrian Patrick Farnell
A Witness

For Trial
George Syrginis
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
John Keith Mogford

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Martin John Mace
Shaun Andrew Blake
Gregory John Medcraft

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Jacob Adam Williams

2:15pm For Plea
Derek George Arnol

4:15pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Application to Revoke Bail
Jason Robert Burns

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link from Launceston Reception Prison
Chad Richard Talbott

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Timothy Peter Hingston

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On Wednesday, 22 June 2016, several cases were listed before the Supreme Court of Tasmania. Robyn Diane Cotton's case was part-heard for trial, and the court was set to hear arguments and evidence from both parties. Aaron Leonard Townsend was due for sentencing after his trial was concluded. The court also scheduled a bail variation application for GIM and a trial for Adrian Eugene Kelleher, with sentencing set for later in the day. Joshua Lawrence Plummer and Eric Michael Benjamin were to make bail applications. George Syrginis's case was part-heard, with sentencing scheduled for later. Adrian Patrick Farnell was listed as a witness for the trial of A.

The legal issues in these cases involved a range of criminal charges, including assault, theft, and drug offenses. The court was required to decide whether the prosecution had met its burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt for each charge, to consider the evidence presented, and to determine the appropriate sentence for those found guilty. The court also had to assess bail applications, weighing the risk of flight, the seriousness of the charges, and the likelihood of reoffending. The legal principles governing these decisions include the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial, and the proportionality of sentences.

The reasoning of the court in each case was guided by the evidence presented, applicable laws, and legal precedents. For sentencing, the court considered the nature of the offense, the offender's background, and the impact on victims. In bail applications, the court evaluated the risk factors and determined whether the accused was likely to appear in court. For trials, the court assessed the credibility of witnesses, the reliability of evidence, and the legal standards required to secure a conviction. The outcomes of these cases involved the determination of guilt or innocence, the imposition of sentences, and the granting or refusal of bail applications.

The final orders of the court included sentences for those found guilty, bail variations, and the continuation of trials. The court's decisions were based on a thorough examination of the evidence and adherence to legal principles. The outcomes reflected the court's role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice in the criminal justice system.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established