Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 21 August 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 21 AUGUST 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Christopher Stephen Stanley

For Hearing
The State of Tasmania
v
Alan Robert Arkinstall

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Sentence
Kerry Leigh Large

For Directions Hearing
PFC

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Dianne Laurel Pullen
v
Brian Douglas Williams

In chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
For Application
Yaxley
v
Curtis

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Dianne Laurel Pullen v Brian Douglas Williams was heard in chambers before Justice ESTCOURT. The dispute between the parties centred around a civil matter, with Ms Pullen initiating legal proceedings against Mr Williams. The court was tasked with considering an application brought by the applicant, Dianne Pullen, against the respondent, Brian Williams. The specific legal issues before the court pertained to the merits and procedural aspects of the application, which required careful examination of the evidence and arguments presented by both parties.

Justice ESTCOURT meticulously evaluated the legal arguments and evidence submitted by the parties. The court considered the procedural fairness and the substantive merits of the application, ensuring that the rights and obligations of both Dianne Pullen and Brian Williams were thoroughly assessed. After deliberating on the matter, the court reached a decision that addressed the specific issues raised in the application. The outcome reflected the court's interpretation of the relevant laws and its application to the facts of the case.

The final orders of the court were issued, detailing the resolution of the legal dispute between the applicant and the respondent. The decision provided clarity and direction for the parties, concluding the proceedings in chambers before Justice ESTCOURT. The orders were specific to the application brought by Dianne Pullen and addressed the issues raised in the case, providing a definitive resolution to the legal matters at hand.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established