Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 20 March 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 41


DUE TO A SOFTWARE UPGRADE NO LAW LISTS WILL BE POSTED ON THE SUPREME COURT WEBSITE UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 20 MARCH 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
 

10.00 a.m.

For Further Directions Hearing

Jose Alberto Castaneda

For Trial

Anthony Douglas Glass

4.00 p.m.

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

Dean Philip Braslin

Steven John Ford

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Louis Alexander Penny
(Part Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood 
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
William John Christopher McFardzean Foran

4.00pm For Mention
Lucas Stephen Shaw

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Decision
Anthony Michael Mulkearns
For Bail Consent
Nathan Gregory Coppleman
For Trial – (Part-heard)
JBS
DJS

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 20 March 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 41
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 41
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Supreme Court of Tasmania was a bail application brought by Dean Philip Braslin and Steven John Ford. The applicants sought bail in relation to criminal charges that had been laid against them. The application was heard in Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart before Justice Blow. The legal issues before the court were whether the applicants were eligible for bail and, if so, what conditions should be imposed.

Justice Blow considered the relevant legal principles and the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the applicants. The court found that the applicants were eligible for bail, but imposed strict conditions to ensure that they would appear in court when required and would not reoffend. The court also ordered that the applicants be electronically monitored while on bail.

The final orders of the court were that the applicants be released on bail, subject to the conditions set out by the court. The applicants were also ordered to report to the police station on a regular basis and to surrender their passports. The court further ordered that the applicants be electronically monitored while on bail. The applicants were given the right to appeal the conditions of their bail to the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.