SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 20 APRIL 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Clinton Peter Raven
Part Heard
For Bail Consent
John William Laurence Fidler
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
10:00 a.m.
For Legal Argument
Aaron Leonard Townsend
(Part Heard)
4:15 p.m. via Video-Link
In the matter of Lee-Anne Marie Levett and an application by a witness
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Plea
Craig Anthony Devine
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Andrew Dickson
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Tamzin Peta Hookway
v
Stirling Mathew Hookway
(Part Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Jadwan Pty Ltd
v
Rae and Partners and ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Adam Maxwell Cox
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Andrew Dickson
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 20 April 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 78
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 78
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Legal issues in these cases ranged from the admissibility of witness applications in criminal matters to the determination of bail conditions and plea negotiations. The court also handled a civil trial between Tamzin Peta Hookway and Stirling Mathew Hookway and a hearing for Jadwan Pty Ltd against Rae and Partners and others.
The reasoning and outcomes of the hearings would depend on the specifics of each case, including the evidence presented, the arguments made by the parties, and the relevant legal precedents. The court's decisions would reflect its application of statutory and common law principles to the facts of each case. Final orders would be made according to the outcomes of the hearings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.