Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 2 October 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 2 OCTOBER 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing

Jamie Peter Smart
v
The State of Tasmania

(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Not Before 12:00 p.m.
For Hearing
Scott Thomas Clarke
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
2:15 p.m.
For Decision

Angela King
v
Director of Housing

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Daniel Benjamin Bradshaw
Corey Luke Cordwell

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Decision

Glenn Edward Gibson
v
The Full Bench of the Tasmanian Industrial Commission

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
The Public Trustee
v
Oliver & Ors

12:00 p.m.
Third Party Application
Stronach
v
Calvary Health Care Tasmania Limited & Anor

2:15 p.m.
Enter Judgment
Glover
v
Brown & Ors

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Constantine
v
Hanley

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Constantine & Ors
v
Hanley

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Jamie Peter Smart against the State of Tasmania was heard on October 2, 2013. The court was required to determine several legal issues, including the admissibility of certain evidence and the interpretation of relevant statutory provisions. The matter was part-heard, with further hearings scheduled.

The Court of Criminal Appeal examined the case of Scott Thomas Clarke against the State of Tasmania, with the focus on the procedural fairness of the defendant's trial and the sufficiency of the evidence presented. The appeal court assessed whether the trial judge made any errors that could have affected the outcome of the case.

The Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over the case of Angela King against the Director of Housing. The court had to decide whether the Director's decision to terminate housing support was lawful, rational, and procedurally fair. The Full Court delivered its decision, which addressed the legal principles applicable to the case and the evidence presented.

In addition to the above cases, the Supreme Court of Tasmania also handled various other matters, including sentencing, civil decisions, and third-party applications. The court's decisions in these cases were made in accordance with the relevant legal principles and the evidence presented.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established