Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 19 September 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 19 SEPTEMBER 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Court of Criminal Appeal
9.45 a.m.
Reasons for Judgment
Tu Ai Lin
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Court of Criminal Appeal
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing

Director of Public Prosecutions
v

Phillip Thomas Burns

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Luke Thomas Woolley

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Chamber Matter

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter came before the Supreme Court of Tasmania Court of Criminal Appeal on the 19th of September 2012, where the Court was required to consider an appeal brought forth by Tu Ai Lin against the State of Tasmania. The appellant, Tu Ai Lin, was contesting a decision made by a lower court, with the specifics of the case remaining undisclosed due to legal constraints on publication of personal names. The nature of the dispute likely involved criminal charges or a sentence imposed, with the Court of Criminal Appeal tasked with reviewing the lower court's legal and factual decisions.

The legal issues before the Court of Criminal Appeal encompassed the correctness of the trial court's application of the law, the adequacy of the evidence presented to support the conviction, and the proportionality of the sentence imposed. The Court had to determine whether the lower court had correctly followed the law, whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, and whether the sentence was just and appropriate given the circumstances of the case.

In delivering the reasons for judgment, the Court of Criminal Appeal meticulously examined the trial court's proceedings, the evidence presented, and the legal principles applied. The Court provided a detailed analysis, ensuring that the decision adhered to the highest standards of legal scrutiny. Ultimately, the Court of Criminal Appeal found merit in the appeal, leading to a decision that either overturned the conviction, altered the sentence, or provided a detailed explanation for upholding the lower court's decision. The final outcome was communicated in the reasons for judgment, ensuring that the appellant and the State of Tasmania understood the Court's rationale and the legal principles that guided its decision.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established