SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 19 JUNE 2013
HOBART
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
Via video link to Launceston
For Sentence
Jacob Adam Williams
For Mention
State of Tasmania
v
Deborah Dawn Percy
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
Via video link from Burnie
For Application
Stuart Malcolm Allen
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Christopher Harold Denny
For Trial
Jake James Smith
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Jayden Michael Murtagh
Nicole Anne Kennedy
Jamie Reginald Hall
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
For Judgment
Chris Gurney
v
Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council
For Hearing
APF Properties Pty Ltd
v
Robinson Investment Capital Pty Ltd
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Jadwan Pty Ltd
v
Rae & Partners & Ors
12.00 p.m.
Submissions
Raspin
v
The Motor Accidents Insurance Board
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
Dismiss Action/Enter Judgment
Bomford
v
Michelle O’Byrne Minister for Health
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Brett Christopher Hayes
In Court As In Chambers
4.00pm For Bail Application
JSRM
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Blow by video-link from Court 1, Supreme Court, Hobart
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court
10.00am For Judgment
Chris Gurney v Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm For Sentence
Jacob Adam Williams
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m. For Mention
Jake Clinton Baarsoe
For Trial (Part Heard)
Alan Robert Arkinstall
4.00 p.m. For Application (by Video Link to Hobart)
Stuart Malcolm Allen
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 19 June 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 105
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 105
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to address several legal issues, including the appropriate sentencing for Jacob Adam Williams, the merits of Stuart Malcolm Allen's application, and the outcome of the judgment in Chris Gurney v Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council. For criminal cases, the court had to consider factors such as the nature of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. In civil cases, the court needed to determine the validity of claims, the application of legal principles, and the appropriate remedies.
The court's reasoning and outcome varied across the cases. In the criminal cases, the court considered the evidence presented, the arguments from both the prosecution and the defence, and the relevant legal principles to determine the appropriate sentence or bail conditions. In the civil cases, the court examined the merits of the claims, the applicable law, and the appropriate remedies. For example, in the case of Chris Gurney v Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council, the court would have considered the evidence and arguments to determine whether the council was liable for the claims made by Chris Gurney.
The final orders of the court included sentences for Jacob Adam Williams, decisions on applications such as Stuart Malcolm Allen's, and judgments in civil cases like Chris Gurney v Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council. The outcomes of these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved, including the enforcement of sentences, the granting or denial of bail, and the resolution of civil disputes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.