Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 19 June 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 19 JUNE 2013

HOBART
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
Via video link to Launceston
For Sentence
Jacob Adam Williams

For Mention
State of Tasmania
v
Deborah Dawn Percy

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
Via video link from Burnie
For Application
Stuart Malcolm Allen

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Christopher Harold Denny

For Trial
Jake James Smith
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Jayden Michael Murtagh
Nicole Anne Kennedy
Jamie Reginald Hall

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
For Judgment
Chris Gurney
v
Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council

For Hearing
APF Properties Pty Ltd
v
Robinson Investment Capital Pty Ltd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Jadwan Pty Ltd
v
Rae & Partners & Ors

12.00 p.m.
Submissions
Raspin
v
The Motor Accidents Insurance Board

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
Dismiss Action/Enter Judgment
Bomford
v
Michelle O’Byrne Minister for Health

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

In Court
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Brett Christopher Hayes

In Court As In Chambers
4.00pm For Bail Application
JSRM

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Blow by video-link from Court 1, Supreme Court, Hobart
Civil Jurisdiction

In Court
10.00am For Judgment
Chris Gurney v Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council

Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm For Sentence
Jacob Adam Williams

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m. For Mention
Jake Clinton Baarsoe

For Trial (Part Heard)

Alan Robert Arkinstall

4.00 p.m. For Application (by Video Link to Hobart)
Stuart Malcolm Allen

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a range of cases on 19 June 2013. Notable cases included sentencing for Jacob Adam Williams, an application by Stuart Malcolm Allen, and a judgment in Chris Gurney v Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council. In the criminal jurisdiction, the court dealt with matters such as bail applications, mentions, and trials. Civil cases included judgments, hearings, and directions hearings.

The court was required to address several legal issues, including the appropriate sentencing for Jacob Adam Williams, the merits of Stuart Malcolm Allen's application, and the outcome of the judgment in Chris Gurney v Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council. For criminal cases, the court had to consider factors such as the nature of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. In civil cases, the court needed to determine the validity of claims, the application of legal principles, and the appropriate remedies.

The court's reasoning and outcome varied across the cases. In the criminal cases, the court considered the evidence presented, the arguments from both the prosecution and the defence, and the relevant legal principles to determine the appropriate sentence or bail conditions. In the civil cases, the court examined the merits of the claims, the applicable law, and the appropriate remedies. For example, in the case of Chris Gurney v Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council, the court would have considered the evidence and arguments to determine whether the council was liable for the claims made by Chris Gurney.

The final orders of the court included sentences for Jacob Adam Williams, decisions on applications such as Stuart Malcolm Allen's, and judgments in civil cases like Chris Gurney v Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council. The outcomes of these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved, including the enforcement of sentences, the granting or denial of bail, and the resolution of civil disputes.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established