SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 18 JULY 2012
HOBART
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Sentence
Shane John Hammond
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Costs Application
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin & Ors
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Judgment
Ivan Anthony
v
Maxam Australia Pty Ltd
The Queen
v
Registrar of the Magistrates Court of Tasmania at Burnie,
Ex parte, Ivan Anthony
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Dispense with Service of Writ
Stewart
V
Stewart & Ors
11.00 a.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Taglieri
V
Portfolio Investments Pty Ltd & Anor
Amend Statement of Claim
Leslie & Anor
V
Portfolio investments Pty Ltd
4.00 p.m.
Pre- Trial Conference by telephone
Trumbull- Ward
V
Michell
4.30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Allison
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd & Ors
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 18 July 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 130
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 130
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In another case, Ivan Anthony brought proceedings against Maxam Australia Pty Ltd. The court had to determine the validity of the plaintiff's claims and whether there were any grounds for dismissing the case. The proceedings also involved an application by the plaintiff to the Registrar of the Magistrates Court of Tasmania at Burnie. The court had to decide whether the application was valid and whether it should be heard. Associate Justice Holt presided over the matter in Court 3.
Other cases on the list included an application to dispense with service of a writ, an amendment to a statement of claim, and a pre-trial conference and directions hearing by telephone. The specific details of these cases were not provided in the extract. The Launceston and Burnie courts did not have any listed matters on this date.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.