Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 18 February 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 18 FEBRUARY 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Tanya Maree Silva

For Trial
Fabian James Ackerley Trueman

(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Peter Matthew Yost

For Bail Consent
Ethan Scott Cooper

For Trial
Brett Nathan Webb
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m. via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
For Mention
Aaron John Stebbings

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Darren Maxwell Burge
v
Fiona Mei-Han Patterson

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Josh Daniel Wilson

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Konstandinos Argeropoulos

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Tanya Maree Silva was set for mention before Justice Tennent. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the court list, but it is likely to involve criminal proceedings. The proceedings were scheduled to commence at 10:00 a.m. in Court 7 at Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues before the court were not explicitly stated, but they would likely pertain to the criminal matter involving Ms. Silva. The court was required to address any procedural matters or preliminary issues that needed resolution before proceeding with the substantive hearing.

Justice Tennent presided over the mention and would have provided directions on how the matter should progress. The outcome of the mention would have informed the scheduling of further hearings or trials. Further details of the court's decision and any orders made would be necessary to fully understand the implications of the mention.

No final orders were noted in the court list provided, but it is expected that any significant rulings or directions given by Justice Tennent would be documented in subsequent court records or judgments.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established