SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 18 APRIL 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial (Part Heard)
Kerry Bruce Roberts
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Trial (part-heard)
Anthony Colin Finnegan
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
For Sentence
RJE
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
D K L
v
The State of Tasmania
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Grange Resources (Tasmania) Pty Ltd
V
Metso Minerals Industries Inc & Ors
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Hearing
In the matter of the Estate of the late Joyce Gertrude Frankcombes and an application by Sandra Frances Kelly.
4.00 p.m
For Mention by telephone
Hall
V
Motor Accidents Insurance Board
4.15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by telephone
Fawbert
V
Phipps & Anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Sean Timothy Hudson
Neville Lindsay Whiting
In Court As In Chambers
4.15pm For Bail Application
Gregory Charles Williams
Court 2, Cameron Street Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Civil Jurisdiction
4.15pm For Judgment By Video-Link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Burnie
Bruce Taylor v George Town Residents and Ratepayers Association
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 am For Trial
AN
Civil Jurisdiction
4.15 pm For Judgment
Bruce Taylor v George Town Residents and Ratepayers Association
Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 18 April 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 60
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 60
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the State of Tasmania could be held liable for the plaintiff's claims and, if so, to what extent. The court had to examine the applicable statutory provisions and common law principles to determine the extent of governmental immunity and whether any exceptions applied to the present case. The analysis required a thorough understanding of the relevant statutes, case law, and the principles of public law that govern the liability of the State.
Associate Justice Holt provided a detailed judgment, meticulously reviewing the statutory framework and the relevant case law. The court concluded that the State of Tasmania could not be held liable for the plaintiff's claims due to the specific immunity provisions outlined in the applicable statutes. The judgment was based on a comprehensive analysis of the legal principles and the specific circumstances of the case, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff's claim against the State of Tasmania.
The final order of the court was that the plaintiff's claim against the State of Tasmania was dismissed, and costs were awarded in favor of the defendant. This decision underscored the importance of statutory immunity and the limitations it imposes on the liability of governmental entities.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.