SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 17 SEPTEMBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Application to Discontinue an Appeal against Conviction
Troy Vernon Lovell
For Facts and Sentence
Chantelle Louise Fitzpatrick
4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Robert Raymond Kaye
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing
David William Michaelson
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Roger Wayne Calvert
v
Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Christa Ann Batt
v
Burnie City Council
4:00 p.m.
For Mention by telephone
New bounty Pty Ltd and Anor
v
Winpar Holdings Ltd and Ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Leigh Anthony Neil
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Stephen Matthew Biggs
Anthony David Mitchell
For Plea
Mark Anthony Watkins
Hayden Murray Saunders
Corey George Barnes
Jamie Laurence Carrick
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 17 September 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 192
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 192
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court was required to decide varied depending on the nature of each case. In the criminal trial, the court had to determine the guilt or innocence of the three defendants. In the civil trial, the court needed to decide on the merits of the claim made by Roger Wayne Calvert against the solicitors. Additionally, the court had to consider the application to discontinue an appeal against conviction and the facts and sentence hearing for Chantelle Louise Fitzpatrick.
The court's reasoning and outcome for each case varied. In the criminal trial, the court heard evidence and arguments from both the prosecution and the defence before delivering its verdict. The court's decision in the civil trial was based on the evidence presented by both parties and the applicable legal principles. The court granted the application to discontinue an appeal against conviction, and the facts and sentence hearing were conducted to determine the appropriate sentence for Chantelle Louise Fitzpatrick. The final orders for each case were made by the court after considering all the evidence and arguments presented.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.