Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 16 October 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 16 OCTOBER 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Leesa Nicole Tovey

For Trial
Jose Vasquez-Amay
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Decision
Kingborough Council
v
Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal and Anor

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Tu Ai Lin

(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Mention via video link to Launceston Court 1
Aaron John Stebbings

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Launceston Court 1
Rachelle Anne Brown

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts

ALC

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Assessment of Damages
Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
Flakemore

12:00 p.m.
For Hearing
The Public Trustee
v
Oliver & Ors

2:15 p.m.
Winding Up Application/Adjournment Application
Salter & Anor
v
Pettit Hire Pty Ltd

4:00 p.m.
R414 Directions Hearing by telephone
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
v
Barratt

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Nathan Henry Riley

4.00pm For Mention
Samantha Prewer

For Mention by video-link to the Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Aaron John Stebbings

4.15pm For Sentence by video-link to the Supreme Court, Salamanca Place Hobart
Rachelle Brown

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court As In Chambers
9.15am For Pre-Trial Conference
Loree Ramone Arabena v. Marcus Todman

In Court
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Jesse Luke Kent v. Grace Ellen Payne

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Tanya Margaret Blenkhorn
Jarrod Brian Lockley

2:15 p.m.
For Plea
Barry Grant Ralston

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania provided a schedule for its proceedings on Wednesday, 16 October 2013. This schedule included both criminal and civil cases, along with various hearings and trials in different locations across Tasmania. The court was to address a range of legal matters, including disputes between parties, assessment of damages, and winding-up applications. The Chief Justice and various justices presided over these cases, each dealing with distinct legal issues as outlined in the schedule.

The legal issues before the court included criminal trials, pleas, and sentencing, alongside civil matters such as appeals in resource management, assessment of damages in motor accident insurance cases, and winding-up applications. The court was set to hear both part-heard and full trials, as well as disputed facts and pre-trial conferences. Each case presented unique circumstances that required the court's interpretation of relevant laws and regulations to reach a decision.

The court's reasoning and outcomes for each case would depend on the specific legal issues presented. For example, in criminal cases, the court would consider the evidence presented and the applicable laws to determine guilt or innocence, and in civil cases, the court would assess the merits of the arguments and evidence to decide on damages or other remedies. The outcomes would be communicated at the conclusion of each hearing or trial, with orders or judgments issued as appropriate.

The final orders from the court would reflect the decisions made in each case, including sentences in criminal matters and judgments or orders in civil matters. These orders would be documented and available for the parties involved and any interested parties to review. The detailed outcomes would be essential for understanding the court's application of the law to the specific facts of each case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established