Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 16 December 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 275


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 16 DECEMBER 2015

HOBART
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Application for Judgment
63 St John Street Pty Ltd and Anor
v
Douglas & Collins (A Firm) and Ors

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 16 December 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 275
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 275
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the matter of 63 St John Street Pty Ltd and Anorv Douglas & Collins (A Firm) and Others was heard on Wednesday, 16 December 2015, before Associate Justice Holt in Hobart. The dispute involved an application for judgment, with the applicants seeking a determination on certain legal issues related to their claim. The proceedings took place in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide pertained to the merits of the application for judgment. The applicants sought a ruling on whether they were entitled to a judgment in their favour based on the evidence and arguments presented. The court needed to examine the merits of the case, including the factual background, the applicable law, and the weight of the evidence provided by both parties.

In delivering the judgment, Associate Justice Holt considered the evidence and arguments from both the applicants and the respondents. The court evaluated the legal principles and precedents relevant to the case. After careful consideration, the court concluded that the applicants were entitled to judgment in their favour. The reasoning and outcome were based on the court's assessment of the evidence and the application of the law to the specific circumstances of the case.

The final orders of the court were that judgment be entered in favour of the applicants, 63 St John Street Pty Ltd and Anorv Douglas & Collins (A Firm) and Others, as detailed in the judgment provided by Associate Justice Holt.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.