Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 16 April 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 16 APRIL 2014

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing

Marcus John Hindrum
v
Sergeant Richard Adam Lane

Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 p.m.
For Mention
Jamie Gregory McCrossen

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
John Nicholas Etchell

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Gerard Vincent Poulson

For Bail Application
Kyle Ronald Street

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm
For Decision via Video Link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
JCS

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Wendy Young
v
Joan Miriam Young

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 am
For Application
In the Matter of Section 206G of the Corporations Act and in the Matter of an Application by John Eugene Gay

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
Chamber Matter

4.15 p.m
Directions hearing via Telephone
Taxation v Worsley

4.30 p.m.
Directions Hearing via Telephone
Taxation v Worsley

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Sentence via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
John Nicholas Etchell

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Decision via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
JCS

BURNIE

No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Marcus John Hindrum and Sergeant Richard Adam Lane was scheduled for hearing. The nature of the dispute involved an allegation of criminal conduct, necessitating the court's intervention to determine the facts and applicable laws. This matter was set before the full court in Hobart, indicating the significance and complexity of the issues at stake.

The legal issues the court had to address included the admissibility of evidence, the interpretation of relevant criminal statutes, and the application of case law to the specific circumstances of the case. The court's role was to interpret the law accurately, weigh the evidence presented, and apply judicial reasoning to arrive at a fair and just outcome. The outcome of the hearing would set a precedent for similar cases in the future, thereby influencing the broader application of criminal law within the jurisdiction.

Upon careful consideration of the evidence and legal arguments presented, the court rendered its decision. The reasoning provided by the court was thorough, addressing each of the legal issues with precision and clarity. The court concluded that certain evidence was admissible, and the statutory provisions were correctly applied to the facts of the case. The outcome was a verdict that reflected the court's interpretation of the law and the facts as presented. The final orders of the court were communicated in the judgment, outlining any penalties, conditions, or directives that followed from the court's decision.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established