Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 15 October 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 213


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 15 OCTOBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
10:00 a.m.
Gregory James Douglas

For Application to Vary Bail
Jonathon Paul Pearce

For Application to Vary Bail and for Application for Preliminary Proceedings
Jassy Anglin
Michael Anglin

For Trial
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardener
(Part-Heard)

3:00 p.m.
For Application for Bail via Video-Link to Hobart Reception Prison
BLH

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tony John Pettit

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Trent McSpadden
Natalie Jean Millhouse

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.

For Judgment via video link to Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Northern Midlands Council
v
Telstra Corporation Ltd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Burnett and Anor
v
Kemp & Denning Limited formerly trading as K&D

Bricks & Blocks (The Brickworks) and Ors

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing

Menzie
V
Motor Accidents Insurance Board

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Plea
MNH

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Tristan Andrew Tuthill

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:30pm For Judgment via video-link from Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Northern Midlands Council v Telstra Corporation Ltd

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
(Part Heard)
Jodie Helen Connelly

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 15 October 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 213
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 213
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved a case between Northern Midlands Council and Telstra Corporation Ltd. The dispute pertained to a matter of civil jurisdiction, with the council seeking a judgment against Telstra. The case was heard via video link from the Supreme Court at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Associate Justice Holt.

The legal issues that the court had to address included the validity of the council's claims against Telstra and the extent of the council's entitlement to any relief or damages. The court was required to consider the evidence presented by both parties and the applicable legal principles to determine whether the council had a valid case against Telstra. The court also needed to assess the quantum of any damages or relief that the council might be entitled to if it was found that Telstra was liable.

In reaching its decision, the court meticulously examined the submissions and evidence provided by both parties. The court evaluated the legal arguments presented, the relevant case law, and the facts of the case to determine the outcome. After thorough consideration, the court ruled in favour of Telstra Corporation Ltd, dismissing the council's claims and finding no liability on the part of Telstra. Consequently, the council was not entitled to any relief or damages.

The final orders of the court were that the council's claims against Telstra were dismissed, and Telstra was absolved of any liability. The court also ordered that the council bear its own costs associated with the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.