Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 13 March 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 13 MARCH 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Trial
Nathan James Carins
(Part-Heard)

2.15 p.m.

For Further Directions Hearing

William Eric Yabsley

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Ian Robert Cooksey
(Part Heard)

Civil Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
In Chambers
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Ivan Mercer
v
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Judgment
Tu Ai Lin

Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Associated Forest Holding Pty Ltd and Ors
v
Gordian Runoff Limited
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER via video link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Burnie
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Witness on Final Notice
Alan Arkinstall

For Bail Consent Letter
Nathan Gregory Coppleman
Anthony Michael Mulkearns
DJS
JBS

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Final Orders
Adams
v
Bosworth

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15am For Mention
Timothy James Tubb v. Christopher Paul Reissig

Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30am Application For Bail (Part-Heard)
Corey Bamber Brooke

10.00am For Mention
Leon Robert Lucas

For Trial (Part-Heard)
SJPM

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Witness on Final Notice
Tamyka Lea Buchanan

For Bail Consent Letter
Nathan Gregory Coppleman
Anthony Michael Mulkearns
DJS
JBS

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the Law Lists for Wednesday, 13 March 2013, detail a range of criminal and civil cases. Among these, notable cases include the part-heard trial of Nathan James Carins in Court 7, presided over by Justice Evans. Another significant case is the part-heard trial of Ian Robert Cooksey in Court 8, overseen by Justice Blow. In civil jurisdiction, a telephone directions hearing involving Ivan Mercer versus Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd is scheduled. Additionally, the case of Associated Forest Holding Pty Ltd and others versus Gordian Runoff Limited, part-heard in Court 2 with Justice Porter presiding via video link to Burnie, is listed. Various bail applications and mention hearings are also scheduled, indicating a busy day for the court.

The legal issues addressed in these cases encompass a variety of criminal and civil matters. The criminal cases involve charges ranging from serious offences to bail applications, requiring the court to assess evidence, legal arguments, and the rights of the accused. The civil cases, such as the directions hearing in the Mercer insurance dispute, necessitate the court to provide procedural guidance and ensure fair processes are followed. Each case demands careful consideration of statutory provisions, case law, and procedural fairness to reach just outcomes.

The reasoning of the court and the outcomes in these cases are not detailed in the provided text. However, the scheduling of part-heard trials and further direction hearings suggests that the court is progressing methodically through complex and potentially contentious issues. The court’s role in managing these cases involves ensuring that all parties receive a fair hearing and that legal processes are adhered to. Given the nature of the cases, the court's decisions will likely have significant implications for the parties involved, affecting their legal rights and obligations.

The final orders in these cases are not specified in the text. The court’s handling of each case, from the initial hearings to potential final judgments, will be crucial in determining the legal outcomes. The court’s decisions are expected to provide clarity and resolution to the disputes presented, ensuring that justice is served in accordance with the law.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established