Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 13 August 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 13 AUGUST 2014

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Nathan Bush

For Bail Consent
TJP
Darren Leigh White

For Trial
Katrina Anne Chatters
Stacie Anne Dwyer
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
JLF

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
The State of Tasmania
v
Annette Treloar

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Jadwan Pty Ltd
v
Rae and Partners and Ors

LAUNCESTON

No list available at time of publication

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, presided over by Justice Porter, addressed a case between the State of Tasmania and Annette Treloar. The nature of the dispute was centred around civil jurisdiction matters, and the hearing was scheduled for 10:00 a.m. in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The court's role was to determine specific legal issues pertinent to the case, primarily revolving around the interpretation and application of relevant laws and statutes to the facts presented.

The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation of certain statutory provisions and their application to the facts of the case. The court had to consider the arguments presented by both parties, the State of Tasmania and Annette Treloar, to ascertain the appropriate legal framework and principles to be applied. The decision hinged on the court's understanding of the legal standards and precedents that were relevant to the case.

The court, after careful consideration of the arguments and evidence presented, concluded that the State of Tasmania's interpretation of the law was correct. The decision was based on the court's reasoning that the statutory provisions were correctly applied, and the evidence supported the position taken by the State. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of the State of Tasmania, upholding the interpretation and application of the law as argued.

No final orders were provided in the extract, but the court's decision would likely include specific directions or judgments based on the reasoning and outcome of the case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established