SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 12 DECEMBER 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Steven Kevin Jones
(Part-Heard)
To Follow
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin
11:30 a.m.
For Trial
Chris Gurney
v
Daniel Jason Murphy & Hobart City Council
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Crow
v
Jones
4.15 p.m.
For Judgment by telephone
Koukias
v
Koukias & Anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Bail Variation
Anita Dawn McGee
For Plea
Adrian Robert Wickham
Nathaneal Andrew David Wilson
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court
9.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Narelle Willcocks v. Djaan Heathcote
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m. For Trial (Part-Heard)
Cyrus Francis Halfacre
Guthrie Gene Halfacre
10.00 a.m. For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Sharen Elizabeth Walker
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 12 December 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 244
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 244
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Legal issues in these cases would have involved criminal charges against individuals, the terms and conditions of bail, the rights and obligations of municipal councils in disputes with residents, and the resolution of personal disputes between individuals and local government authorities. The court had to determine the facts and apply the relevant laws to these cases, including criminal law, bail laws, and civil litigation rules.
The court's reasoning and outcome would have been documented in the court's records and judgments. The specific outcomes were not provided in the extract, but would have been determined based on the evidence and arguments presented. The court's decisions would have been based on the application of the law to the facts of each case.
The final orders of the court would have been documented in the court's records and judgments. These orders would have included any directions for further proceedings, the granting or refusal of bail, and the resolution of the disputes between the parties. The orders would have been based on the court's findings of fact and application of the law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.