Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 12 December 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 12 DECEMBER 2012

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Trial
Steven Kevin Jones

(Part-Heard)

To Follow

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin

11:30 a.m.
For Trial
Chris Gurney
v
Daniel Jason Murphy & Hobart City Council

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.

For Hearing

Crow

Jones

4.15 p.m.
For Judgment by telephone
Koukias
v
Koukias & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Bail Variation
Anita Dawn McGee

For Plea
Adrian Robert Wickham
Nathaneal Andrew David Wilson

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court

9.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Narelle Willcocks v. Djaan Heathcote

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.45 a.m. For Trial (Part-Heard)
Cyrus Francis Halfacre
Guthrie Gene Halfacre

10.00 a.m. For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Sharen Elizabeth Walker

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several matters on the 12th of December 2012, across Hobart, Launceston and Burnie. In Hobart, Court 7 was occupied with a criminal trial involving Steven Kevin Jones, which was part-heard, while a bail application by Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey was also heard. In the civil jurisdiction, Clarence City Council was pursuing a case against Darryl Robert Howlin, and Chris Gurney was suing Daniel Jason Murphy and the Hobart City Council. Associate Justice Holt presided over a hearing of Crow v Jones and was scheduled to deliver a judgment by telephone in Koukias v Koukias & Anor.

Legal issues in these cases would have involved criminal charges against individuals, the terms and conditions of bail, the rights and obligations of municipal councils in disputes with residents, and the resolution of personal disputes between individuals and local government authorities. The court had to determine the facts and apply the relevant laws to these cases, including criminal law, bail laws, and civil litigation rules.

The court's reasoning and outcome would have been documented in the court's records and judgments. The specific outcomes were not provided in the extract, but would have been determined based on the evidence and arguments presented. The court's decisions would have been based on the application of the law to the facts of each case.

The final orders of the court would have been documented in the court's records and judgments. These orders would have included any directions for further proceedings, the granting or refusal of bail, and the resolution of the disputes between the parties. The orders would have been based on the court's findings of fact and application of the law.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established