Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 10 April 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 10 APRIL 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Sentence
Scott Graham Campbell

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.

For Trial

Meaganne Glover

(Part Heard)

2.15 p.m.

For Sentence

Joshua Michael Murtagh

Zach James Muir-Bennett

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Jose Alberto Castaneda
(Part-Heard)

In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Nigel Rutherford Henry
v
Robin Glynn Bowles

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Strike out Statement of Claim
Liang
v
Welcom Pty Ltd & Ors

4.00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Fielding
v
Bramich

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Terence Williams

BURNIE
No list for Burnie until further notice

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a session on Wednesday, 10 April 2013, featuring various criminal and civil cases. Among the cases listed were Scott Graham Campbell and Meaganne Glover, both of whom were scheduled for sentencing and trial, respectively. The court also handled civil matters such as a telephone directions hearing in the case of Nigel Rutherford Henry versus Robin Glynn Bowles, presided over by Associate Justice Holt.

The legal issues before the court encompassed sentencing in criminal cases, the determination of guilt in ongoing trials, and the administration of justice in civil proceedings. For instance, the court had to consider the appropriate sentence for Scott Graham Campbell, assess the evidence and arguments in the ongoing trial of Meaganne Glover, and provide directions in the civil matter involving Nigel Rutherford Henry and Robin Glynn Bowles. Additionally, the court faced the procedural matter of striking out a statement of claim in the case of Liang versus Welcom Pty Ltd and others.

Justice Tennent presided over the sentencing of Scott Graham Campbell, while Justice Wood and Justice Estcourt managed the trials of Meaganne Glover and Jose Alberto Castaneda, respectively. Associate Justice Holt oversaw the civil case involving telephone directions for the dispute between Nigel Rutherford Henry and Robin Glynn Bowles. The court's reasoning and outcome would have been based on the evidence presented, applicable laws, and legal precedents. The final orders would depend on the specific findings and judgments made by the respective justices.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established