Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 1 October 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 1 OCTOBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Katrina Anne Chatters
Stacie Anne Dwyer

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Application
Stuart Malcolm Allen

4:15p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Andrew Michael Richardson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
2:15 p.m.
For Judgment via video link to Burnie

Graeme Edwards
v

Tasmanian Mines Limited

LAUNCESTON
No law list for Launceston

BURNIE
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
2:15 p.m.
For Judgment (via video link to Burnie)

Graeme Edwards
v
Tasmanian Mines Limited

Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence (via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart)
Andrew Michael Richardson

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On 1 October 2014, the Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over several cases, both criminal and civil. Among these was the case of Katrina Anne Chatters and Stacie Anne Dwyer, who appeared in Court 7 for sentencing. The legal issues in this case would pertain to the charges brought against Chatters and Dwyer and the subsequent sentencing following their convictions. Another matter involved Stuart Malcolm Allen, who had a criminal application scheduled in Court 8, likely concerning bail, pre-trial procedures, or some other aspect of the criminal process. The court was also set to sentence Andrew Michael Richardson via a video link to the Supreme Court in Burnie, indicating that Richardson was either unable to be present in person or was serving a sentence in another location.

Civil matters were also on the agenda, with a case between Graeme Edwards and Tasmanian Mines Limited scheduled for judgment in both Hobart and Burnie. The case was presided over by Chief Justice Blow in both instances, highlighting its significance. The nature of the dispute between Edwards and Tasmanian Mines Limited is not detailed in the extract, but it could involve any number of civil matters such as contract disputes, tort claims, or other civil wrongdoings. The court’s reasoning and outcome in these cases would be based on the evidence presented and applicable legal principles.

The final orders in these cases would depend on the outcomes of the judgments and sentencing hearings. For the criminal cases, sentences would be determined based on the severity of the offenses and any mitigating or aggravating factors presented. In the civil case, the court would issue a judgment that resolves the dispute between Edwards and Tasmanian Mines Limited, potentially including orders for damages, injunctions, or other remedies.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established