Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 1 April 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 1 APRIL 2015

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Denison Ong Chin Jui
Nicholas David McWilliams
Joseph Andrew Edwards
(Part Heard)

Not before 10:30 a.m.
For Mention
Elsawi Ahmed Eldayar
Alhaji Ismail Kamara
Mohammad Bastoni
Michael Robert Underwood
Samuel William Murray Mulholland

For Plea
Christopher James Gerrard

For Plea in Mitigation
Christopher Paul Minehan

11:30 a.m.
For Mention
Ellen Irene Amy Tiller

For Plea
Richard Daniel Graham

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Robert John Christiaan Nieuwhof

For Sentence
Benjamin Michael Fama

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before JUSTICE TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 2, Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Mitchell John House (by his litigation guardian Rodney Craig House)
v
Michael Geoffrey Lester and Ors

Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
Michael Geoffrey Lester and Ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Stay Action
Water Industry Solutions Pty Ltd
v
Fenshaw Pty Ltd

Order to Show Cause
Fenshaw Pty Ltd
v
Water Industry Solutions Pty Ltd

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Marshall
v
Hendrick Brinkman t/a C2 Demolition and Anor

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Mackay Rural Pty Ltd and Ors
v
National Australia Bank

4:30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Forest Enterprises Australia Limited (Administrators Appointed)
v
Atkins

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Marco Daniel Rusterholz

4.00pm For Bail Application
Sean Gregory Richardson

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:00am For Directions Hearing via Video-Link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Mitchell John House (by his litigation guardian Rodney Craig House)

v
Michael Geoffrey Lester and Ors

Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
Michael Geoffrey Lester and Ors

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Plea
Ricky John Izard
Amanda Jane Fazackerley

4:00pm For Plea
Justin Ryan Barnes

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, located in Hobart, has a variety of matters listed for hearing on April 1, 2015. In Criminal Jurisdiction, the court has several trials, mentions, and pleas scheduled, including the continuation of a part-heard trial involving three defendants. The court will also address bail applications, sentences, and mitigation pleas. In Civil Jurisdiction, the court has several directions hearings scheduled, including a case concerning a motor accident insurance board and another party, and another involving stay actions and an order to show cause. A directions hearing is also scheduled in a case involving demolition services.

The legal issues before the court range from criminal matters such as theft, drug offenses, and assault, to civil matters involving motor accidents, insurance, and contractual disputes. The court must decide whether the defendants are guilty or not guilty, the appropriate sentences for those found guilty, and the outcomes of various civil disputes. The court will also consider applications for bail and orders to show cause in the civil matters.

The reasoning and outcome of each case will depend on the specific facts and evidence presented. The court will consider the legal arguments presented by the parties, as well as any applicable laws and precedents. The final orders of the court will be determined based on the merits of each case and the evidence presented. The court will aim to provide just and fair outcomes for all parties involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established