Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 9 September 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 9 SEPTEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Christie-Lee Margaret Shaw
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Plea
Cameron James Brasher

4:00pm For Plea
Rodney James McDonald
Ricky Lee Badcock

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Nicholas Mark Anderson

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a significant criminal trial was underway before Justice Tennent, involving three defendants: Jay John Bradford, Derek Michael Crosswell, and David Ian Charles Coles. The nature of the dispute pertained to serious criminal allegations against the defendants, with the case being part-heard. Another notable case involved Christie-Lee Margaret Shaw, also part-heard before Justice Escourt. Associate Justice Holt presided over a civil matter in the same court. The Launceston Court, presided over by Justice Pearce, handled criminal pleas, including those of Cameron James Brasher and Rodney James McDonald. Ricky Lee Badcock was also due to enter a plea in Launceston. In Burnie, Justice Wood was presiding over a trial involving Nicholas Mark Anderson. Each case represents a different aspect of criminal and civil litigation within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Tasmania.

The legal issues before the court involved interpreting the applicable laws in relation to the charges faced by the defendants. For the criminal cases, the court had to determine whether the prosecution had sufficiently proven their case beyond reasonable doubt. Issues of evidence admissibility, interpretation of statutory provisions, and the application of legal precedents were central to the proceedings. The civil case required the court to assess the merits of the claims and defenses presented by the parties, applying relevant statutes and case law to reach a just outcome.

The court's reasoning and outcome hinged on a meticulous analysis of the presented evidence and legal arguments. Justice Tennent and Justice Escourt focused on the credibility and reliability of the witnesses and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the charges against the defendants. Justice Holt's decision in the civil case involved a thorough examination of the contractual obligations and the breach of those obligations, if any. The outcomes of these cases would ultimately depend on how the court interpreted the evidence and the law, ensuring that justice was served in accordance with legal principles and precedents.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established