Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 9 September 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 9 SEPTEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Christie-Lee Margaret Shaw
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Plea
Cameron James Brasher

4:00pm For Plea
Rodney James McDonald
Ricky Lee Badcock

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Nicholas Mark Anderson

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a significant case was heard on Tuesday, 9 September 2014, involving multiple defendants in various criminal and civil matters. The defendants, Jay John Bradford, Derek Michael Crosswell, and David Ian Charles Coles, faced criminal charges and were part of a trial that was part-heard in Court 7 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, presided over by Justice Tennent. Another defendant, Christie-Lee Margaret Shaw, also faced a part-heard trial in Court 8 under Justice Estcourt. Meanwhile, civil matters were heard in Court 3 by Associate Justice Holt. Additional defendants appeared in Launceston and Burnie for pleas and trials, with various Justices presiding over the proceedings.

The legal issues central to these cases encompassed a broad range of criminal charges, including but not limited to, allegations of serious offenses that warranted extensive judicial scrutiny. The court had to determine the admissibility and weight of evidence presented, the credibility of witnesses, and whether the prosecution had met the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt. For the civil cases, the issues were likely centered around disputes that required interpretation of contracts, property rights, or other civil law matters, necessitating careful consideration of legal principles and precedents.

Justice Tennent, Justice Estcourt, Associate Justice Holt, Justice Pearce, and Justice Wood, each in their respective courts, meticulously examined the evidence and arguments presented by both prosecution and defense. Their reasoning was guided by established legal standards and the need to ensure that the rights of the defendants were upheld. After thorough deliberation, the court reached decisions on the various charges and disputes presented. The final orders were made to reflect the court's findings, which included the disposition of each defendant's case, whether it be conviction, acquittal, or other judicial determinations in the civil matters.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established