SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 8 APRIL 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
Via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Sentence
Jason Noel Browning
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
John Peter George Mazurek
(Part-Heard)
For Trial
Gerard Vincent Poulson
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Via video link to Court 2, Supreme Court, Launceston
For Hearing
Darryl Robert Howlin
v
Clarence City Council
(Part-Heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4.00pm
For Decision
Adrian Wayne Smillie
v
Legal Aid Commission of Tasmania
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Paul Johnathon Allison
v
John Charles White
Kristy Louise Olding
v
John Charles White
(Part-Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
In Court as In Chambers for Bail Application
Luke James Reader
4:15pm
For Sentence via video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jason Noel Browning
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15pm
In Court as in Chambers For Hearing via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Darryl Howlin v Clarence City Council
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 8 April 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 66
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 66
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court faces several legal issues in these hearings. For the sentencing of Jason Noel Browning, the court must determine the appropriate penalty for his criminal offence, considering factors such as the severity of the crime, Browning's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. In the trial of John Peter George Mazurek and Gerard Vincent Poulson, the court must evaluate the evidence presented to determine whether the defendants are guilty of the charges brought against them. This involves assessing the credibility of witnesses, the reliability of evidence, and the application of relevant legal standards. For the part-heard trial of Stephen Roy Standage, the court will continue to examine the evidence and arguments from both the prosecution and the defence to reach a verdict.
The court's reasoning and outcome will be based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and applicable law. For the sentencing of Jason Noel Browning, Justice Porter will consider the nature of the offence, the principles of sentencing, and any submissions from both the prosecution and the defence. The court's decision will reflect a balance between deterrence, rehabilitation, and proportionality. In the trial of John Peter George Mazurek and Gerard Vincent Poulson, Justice ESTCOURT will carefully assess the credibility of the witnesses and the strength of the evidence to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants. The verdict will be based on whether the prosecution has proven the charges beyond reasonable doubt. For the part-heard trial of Stephen Roy Standage, Justice TENNENT will continue to evaluate the evidence and arguments, ensuring that the trial is conducted fairly and in accordance with legal standards. The outcome will depend on the weight of the evidence and the application of the law to the facts of the case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.