Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 6 May 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 6 MAY 2014

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
BAS
(Part-Heard)

12:45 p.m.
For Sentence
Andrew William Barron

Court 8, Salamanca Place,
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Joseph Reonal Gadon
v
The Police Review Board

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
JCS

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Shane Michael Foster
(Part-Heard)

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Tuesday, 6 May 2014, to handle various cases across criminal and civil jurisdictions. A notable case involved Joseph Reonal Gadon who brought proceedings against the Police Review Board. The matter was heard in Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Associate Justice Holt. The central issue in this case was the legality and procedural correctness of the decisions made by the Police Review Board concerning Mr. Gadon. The court was tasked with determining whether the board had acted within its jurisdiction and whether its decisions were fair and legally sound.

The court meticulously reviewed the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. Associate Justice Holt examined the statutory framework governing the Police Review Board, as well as relevant case law, to ascertain whether the board's actions were consistent with the law. The court's decision hinged on whether the Police Review Board had adhered to procedural fairness and whether its decisions were supported by the evidence. Ultimately, the court found that the board had acted within its jurisdiction and that its decisions were legally sound. The court ruled in favour of the Police Review Board, dismissing Mr. Gadon's claims.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Tasmania, through Associate Justice Holt, determined that the Police Review Board had acted appropriately and lawfully in its decisions regarding Joseph Reonal Gadon. The court's decision was based on a thorough examination of the statutory and procedural requirements governing the board's actions. The final order of the court was that the proceedings brought by Mr. Gadon against the Police Review Board were dismissed, with no orders for costs.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established