Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 5 June 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 5 JUNE 2012

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Brian Lyle Clarke

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 5 June 2012, detail the cases scheduled for that day. In Criminal Jurisdiction, Court 8 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, a case involving Brian Lyle Clarke was set for sentencing at 2.15 p.m. before Justice Wood. In Civil Jurisdiction, Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, Associate Justice Holt was to preside over miscellaneous civil business commencing at 9.30 a.m. The lists indicate that no cases were scheduled for Launceston or Burnie.

The legal issues in these cases likely pertain to sentencing in the criminal case and the resolution of miscellaneous civil matters. For the criminal case, the court would need to consider the appropriate sentence for Brian Lyle Clarke, taking into account any mitigating or aggravating factors, as well as statutory guidelines and precedents. In the civil case, the specific issues would depend on the nature of the miscellaneous matters being heard, which could include disputes related to contracts, property, family law, or other civil claims.

Justice Wood, in the sentencing hearing, would consider the nature and severity of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any submissions from both the prosecution and the defence. The sentencing principles would aim to ensure justice is served, considering the principles of deterrence, rehabilitation, and proportionality. Associate Justice Holt, presiding over the civil matters, would apply relevant statutory provisions and common law principles to resolve the disputes brought before the court. The outcome would depend on the evidence presented, the arguments made by the parties, and the application of relevant legal principles.

No specific final orders are mentioned in the excerpt, but typically, in sentencing, the court would deliver a custodial sentence, a fine, or community service, depending on the case's circumstances. In civil matters, the court would provide a judgment or order resolving the disputes in accordance with the law and the evidence presented.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established