SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 4 NOVEMBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Nathan Robert Griffith
(Part-Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Gregory Patrick Kotynia-English
(Part Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Trysten Anthony Bennett
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Adrian Raymond Nattey
(Part-Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
C.A.R.S. Pty Ltd
v
John Charles Brent and Peter Leonard Brent
(Part-Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am for Mention by Video Link
CMH
For Mention
Peter Harold Greaves
Mark Andrew Jenkins
Alissa Margaret Moore
For Trial
Jacob Scott Kevin Riley-McDonald
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Nicholas Charles Pitt
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 4 November 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 235
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 235
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included determining the outcomes of ongoing trials, handling bail consent disputes, and addressing miscellaneous civil matters. For example, in the case of Trysten Anthony Bennett, a dispute over facts was heard in Court 8 before Justice Estcourt, where the court was required to resolve issues concerning the presentation and acceptance of certain facts in the case. Additionally, C.A.R.S. Pty Ltd v John Charles Brent and Peter Leonard Brent, a part-heard civil trial, was presided over by Associate Justice Holt in Court 3, indicating the court's role in resolving private disputes between parties.
The court's reasoning and outcomes for each case would depend on the evidence presented, legal arguments made, and the specific legal standards applied. While the document does not detail the outcomes, the court's decisions would be based on the merits of each case, the applicable laws, and judicial discretion. The final orders for each case would be communicated separately, following the conclusion of the respective hearings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.