SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 31 JULY 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place
Before Chief Justice CRAWFORD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court
For Plea
Andrew Robert Muirhead
2.15 p.m.
For Plea
Corey Peter Donoghue
Shannon James Duffy
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Basha Inquiry
Manjing Moses Mading
Scott Brian Enslow
4.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Patrick Thomas Court
Frank Edward Charles Laredo
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
Application to Review an Order Suspending Sentence
Shannon Patrick Pace
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Lorraine Kumari-Lal
v
My Property Hunter Pty Ltd
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Tyler John Mayne
Matthew Wayne Leslie
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Blow
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Hearing
Simon William Dudley and Helen Elizabeth Dudley v Building Appeal Board, Department of Justice
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Mention
Darryl John Heard
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Craig Ronald Jones
4:00 pm
For Plea
Elijah Joshua Bos
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 31 July 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 141
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 141
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court varied across the cases. In the criminal cases, the primary issues were the determination of pleas, sentencing, and the review of orders suspending sentence. For the civil cases, the matters ranged from property disputes to administrative appeals against building decisions. The court was tasked with ensuring that due process was followed in all cases, whether it involved the accused's rights in criminal cases or the proper application of law in civil disputes.
The court's reasoning and outcomes were delivered in line with the legal principles applicable to each case. For instance, in the case of Shannon Patrick Pace, the court considered the merits of the application to review the order suspending sentence, taking into account the relevant legal standards and the circumstances of the case. The court's decisions were aimed at delivering justice in a fair and lawful manner, respecting the rights and obligations of all parties involved.
No specific final orders were mentioned in the summaries provided, but it is expected that the court's rulings would be detailed in the respective case records, reflecting the outcomes of the hearings as per the legal principles and evidence presented.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.