Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 31 July 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 31 JULY 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place
Before Chief Justice CRAWFORD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court
For Plea
Andrew Robert Muirhead

2.15 p.m.
For Plea
Corey Peter Donoghue
Shannon James Duffy

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Basha Inquiry
Manjing Moses Mading
Scott Brian Enslow

4.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Patrick Thomas Court
Frank Edward Charles Laredo

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
Application to Review an Order Suspending Sentence
Shannon Patrick Pace

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Lorraine Kumari-Lal
v
My Property Hunter Pty Ltd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Tyler John Mayne
Matthew Wayne Leslie

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Blow

Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Hearing
Simon William Dudley and Helen Elizabeth Dudley v Building Appeal Board, Department of Justice

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am

For Mention
Darryl John Heard

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Craig Ronald Jones

4:00 pm
For Plea
Elijah Joshua Bos

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a series of hearings on Tuesday, 31 July 2012, in Hobart and Launceston. The hearings included both criminal and civil cases, with a range of matters from pleas to trials and applications. One notable case was that of Andrew Robert Muirhead, who appeared for a plea in the Hobart court before Chief Justice Crawford. Another significant case involved a sentence review application by Shannon Patrick Pace, heard before Justice Wood in the Hobart court.

The legal issues before the court varied across the cases. In the criminal cases, the primary issues were the determination of pleas, sentencing, and the review of orders suspending sentence. For the civil cases, the matters ranged from property disputes to administrative appeals against building decisions. The court was tasked with ensuring that due process was followed in all cases, whether it involved the accused's rights in criminal cases or the proper application of law in civil disputes.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were delivered in line with the legal principles applicable to each case. For instance, in the case of Shannon Patrick Pace, the court considered the merits of the application to review the order suspending sentence, taking into account the relevant legal standards and the circumstances of the case. The court's decisions were aimed at delivering justice in a fair and lawful manner, respecting the rights and obligations of all parties involved.

No specific final orders were mentioned in the summaries provided, but it is expected that the court's rulings would be detailed in the respective case records, reflecting the outcomes of the hearings as per the legal principles and evidence presented.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established