Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 3 September 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 3 SEPTEMBER 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
John Eugene Gay

For Trial
Shane Douglas Glover

For Backstop Trial
Yonnie Judith Kiel

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Timothy Laurence Rozynski

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
MDM
SWDM

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
11.30 a.m.
In Court as In Chambers
Chamber Matter

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial
Stewart George Pyers

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court
For Mention
David Michael Hall

For Trial
Gregory Richard Fox

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was presented before Justice Porter involving a dispute between the parties John Eugene Gay and Shane Douglas Glover. The nature of the dispute appears to be criminal in nature, given the context of the court's criminal jurisdiction. The case was scheduled for mention and trial, indicating that it might involve preliminary hearings or substantive trial processes. The court's proceedings were part of the broader judicial activities outlined for the day, with specific mention of other cases and their respective natures, such as backstop trials and civil matters, showcasing the variety of judicial business being managed.

The legal issues before the court pertained to the criminal charges against the defendants and the procedural steps required to address these charges. The court had to consider the evidence presented, the legal arguments from both the prosecution and the defence, and the application of criminal law principles. Given the nature of the cases mentioned, the court's decision would likely involve interpreting the applicable statutes, assessing the credibility of witnesses, and ensuring that the rights of the defendants were protected throughout the proceedings.

Justice Porter, in delivering the court's reasoning and outcome, would have evaluated the presented evidence and arguments, applying legal standards to reach a decision. The outcome of the case would depend on the specifics of the evidence and the legal arguments, with the court aiming to deliver a just resolution in accordance with the law. The detailed reasoning provided by the court would have been critical in ensuring transparency and the proper application of the law.

The final orders of the court would reflect the outcome of the proceedings, including any findings of guilt or innocence, sentencing if applicable, and any other legal directives necessary to conclude the case. The court's decisions would be documented and available for legal reference, ensuring that the proceedings were conducted with due process and adherence to legal principles.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established