Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 29 October 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 29 OCTOBER 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Dwight Stanley Murtagh
Shane Paul Bennett

For Trial
Daniel Sean Pennicott
(Part Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Tu Ai Lin
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m. via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Mention
Shaun Keverall Kaye

For Sentence
Wayne Marcus Riley
Stephen John Peters

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

4:00 p.m.
Amend Statement of Claim/Reasons for decision
Etter
v
State of Tasmania

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood by Video-Link from Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15pm For Mention
Shaun Keverall Kaye

For Sentence
Stephen John Peters
Wayne Marcus Riley

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.45 a.m.
For Sentence
DSG

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link
Justin Roy John Roughley

For Mention
Jason Theo MacMillan
Ashlea Maree Rigby

For Bail Consent
ZRP

For Trial (part-heard)
JWB

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Barry Grant Ralston

4:15 p.m.
For Directions
Adrian Wayne Smillie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania provided a list of cases for Tuesday, 29 October 2013. The court had a variety of criminal and civil matters scheduled across different courts and locations, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. Among the listed cases was a criminal trial for Daniel Sean Pennicott, with a part hearing scheduled in Court 7 in Hobart before Chief Justice Blow at 10:00 a.m. Another significant case was the sentencing of Stephen John Peters and Wayne Marcus Riley, scheduled to take place in Court 8 in Hobart before Justice Wood at 2:15 p.m., which was conducted via video link from Launceston.

The legal issues before the court included the handling of a part-heard trial for Daniel Sean Pennicott, the sentencing of Stephen John Peters and Wayne Marcus Riley, and various mentions and bail applications. The court was required to decide on the procedural aspects of ongoing trials, the appropriate sentences for convicted defendants, and the outcomes of bail applications. In the civil jurisdiction, the court also had an amendment to a statement of claim and reasons for decision in the case of Etter versus the State of Tasmania, which was set for a hearing in Launceston before Justice Wood via video link from Hobart.

The court's reasoning and outcomes for the listed cases were not detailed in the provided text. However, it is clear that the court was to address the procedural and substantive issues in each case, ensuring that legal rights and obligations were properly considered. The final orders for each case would be determined based on the specific legal issues presented and the evidence and arguments provided during the hearings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established