Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 28 January 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 11


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 28 JANUARY 2014

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Mention
Dwight Stanley Murtagh

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Cassandra Anne Price
v
Southern Cross Television (TNT9) Pty Ltd and Anor
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 28 January 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 11
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 11
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was presented with a case involving Cassandra Anne Price suing Southern Cross Television (TNT9) Pty Ltd and another party, on Tuesday, 28 January 2014. The dispute arose in the Civil Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, presided over by Justice Porter. The plaintiff, Price, brought forward claims against the defendants, the television company and another associated party, which were partially heard on this date. The specifics of the lawsuit were not detailed in the court listing, but it is clear that the case pertains to a civil matter involving potential liability or damages.

The legal issues before the court included the interpretation and application of relevant laws or contractual agreements between the plaintiff and the defendants. The court was required to determine the validity of the claims made by Price, assess the evidence presented, and potentially make rulings on interim matters if the case was part-heard. The court's role was to adjudicate on the facts and legal arguments, providing a decision that would either progress the case towards a full trial or resolve it in part.

In its reasoning, the court likely considered the submissions made by both parties, examined the evidence presented, and applied the appropriate legal principles. The outcome of the proceedings was not explicitly stated in the listing, but it is expected that the court would either provide further directions for the case to proceed or make decisions on the issues raised in this part-heard session. The final orders, detailing the court's decision, would be recorded in the case's legal documentation and would be available for review by the involved parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.