Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday 28 February 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY 28 FEBRUARY 2012
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10.00 a.m.
For Judgment
Darren Scarcella
v
State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Anthony Henry Young
v
Tasmanian Contracting Services Pty Ltd

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Mention
D K L
v
State of Tasmania

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

No law list for Launceston

BURNIE

No law list for Burnie

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was scheduled to hear a number of cases on Tuesday, 28 February 2012. In the first case, Darren Scarcella was set to appeal against a decision of the State of Tasmania, likely related to a criminal matter. In the second case, Anthony Henry Young was scheduled to bring a civil claim against Tasmanian Contracting Services Pty Ltd, presided over by Justice Wood. The third case involved a civil matter where D K L was to bring a claim against the State of Tasmania, to be heard before Associate Justice Holt.

The legal issues in the second case, Anthony Henry Young v Tasmanian Contracting Services Pty Ltd, would likely revolve around the specifics of the civil claim being brought by Mr Young. This could encompass matters such as breach of contract, negligence, or other civil wrongs. The court was required to determine the validity of Mr Young's claims, the extent of any liability on the part of Tasmanian Contracting Services Pty Ltd, and the appropriate remedies or compensation if any claims were found to be valid.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases were not detailed in the document. As such, the court's analysis of the legal issues, the evidence presented, and the final judgments or orders could not be ascertained. The Full Court was set to hear the case of Darren Scarcella v State of Tasmania, indicating a potentially significant or complex matter. Meanwhile, the civil matter between D K L and the State of Tasmania was scheduled for a mention, which typically involves an update or preliminary discussion of the case. The specific outcomes of these cases were not provided in the document.

No final orders or judgments were mentioned in the document. The listing indicated that the court was set to hear appeals, new claims, and case mentions, but the actual outcomes of these hearings were not provided.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established