Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday 27 October 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY 27 OCTOBER 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex

Nicholas Aaron Scott

For Mention

Jamie Douglas Blowfield

For Sentence

Shane Phillip Patrick Jason West

For Plea

Tye Paul Silver

Samuel David Pennicott

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew James Linton
(Part-Heard)

2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Phillip Charles Harrison

4.15 p.m.
For Sentence via video-link
John George Carnie

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Lokendra Singh

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part heard)
Christopher John Humphreys
Luke James Reader

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm For Sentence via video link
From Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
John George Carnie

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Pamela Ruth Hodshon

For Trial
Noel Marcus Smith
(Part Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Jason Michael Dempsey
Christopher Paul Walsh

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania had various hearings scheduled for 27 October 2015, encompassing both criminal and civil matters. The criminal cases involved individuals such as Nicholas Aaron Scott, Jamie Douglas Blowfield, and Shane Phillip Patrick Jason West, with hearings ranging from mentions to trials. The civil matters were overseen by Associate Justice Holt, with miscellaneous civil business being addressed in the morning session. Additionally, the Magistrates Court had its own list of cases to be heard, indicating a busy day for the Tasmanian judicial system.

The legal issues presented in these cases varied widely, from the sentencing of convicted individuals to the progression of ongoing trials. The court had to consider the appropriate penalties for those convicted, the continuation of trials for those awaiting judgment, and the overall management of the court’s docket. Each case brought its own set of legal and factual considerations, requiring the court to navigate through statutory provisions, case law, and the specifics of each individual’s circumstances.

The court's approach was methodical, ensuring that each case received the appropriate judicial attention. For instance, in criminal cases, the court had to balance the principles of justice with the need for effective punishment and rehabilitation. In civil matters, the court focused on resolving disputes efficiently while adhering to legal standards. The outcomes varied, with some cases resulting in immediate sentencing, while others required further deliberation or were part of an ongoing trial process. The court's handling of these cases demonstrated its commitment to timely and fair adjudication.

No specific final orders were detailed in the provided extract, but the court's proceedings suggest that appropriate actions were taken in line with the outcomes of each case. The detailed scheduling and allocation of court time reflect the court's dedication to managing its caseload effectively and ensuring that justice is served in a timely manner.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established