Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 27 November 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 231


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 27 NOVEMBER 2012

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Further Directions Hearing
Luke David Buck
Jason Charles Dare
Eugene William Smith
Peta Louise Feil
Andrew Ian Devine
Lewis Wayne Coles

For Trial
Stuart Barry Russell

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Plea
Henki Bire
Sulaiman Bin Marhaban
Safrudin Wotu

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Damien Scott Fishpool
v
Incat Tasmania Pty Ltd

10.00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
David Bond
v
Damien Johnson

2.15 p.m.
For Hearing
Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Ltd
v
Salvation Army & Anor

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Trial
David Kronenberg and Robyn Kronenberg
v
Stephen Bridge and Stuart Tanner

(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford 

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Clint Graeme Stanisz

For Trial
Thomas James Aliano

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

In Court as In Chambers
10.00 a.m. For Bail Application
JMWM

In Court
For Trial
BKP

For Mention
Luke Anthony Abraham

For Preliminary Proceedings
Danielle Peta McGuinty

For Plea
Peter Mervyn Munday
Daniel Robert Bugg

1.50 p.m.  For Re-Sentence
ZSS

2.15 p.m. For Application
Zachary Alexander Swan

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 27 November 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 231
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 231
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on November 27, 2012, with a variety of cases scheduled across multiple courts and jurisdictions. In Hobart, Court 7 was presided over by Justice Evans, where several criminal cases were set for further directions hearings and trials. Court 8, under Justice Porter, was also handling criminal cases, with a plea hearing and a trial scheduled. Civil cases were heard in Court 1 by Justice Blow, where judgments and hearings were on the agenda. Justice Tennent presided over a partial trial in Court 2, while miscellaneous civil business was conducted in Court 3 by Associate Justice Holt.

The court faced a range of legal issues including the scheduling of further directions in criminal cases, plea hearings, trials, and civil judgments. In the civil arena, disputes involving employment, property, and contractual obligations were among the matters requiring adjudication. The court's agenda reflected its role in both criminal and civil law, addressing issues from preliminary hearings to final judgments.

Justice Evans and Justice Porter focused on criminal matters, ensuring that the due process was followed in the handling of serious offences, including organised crime and individual criminal acts. Justice Blow and Justice Tennent dealt with civil matters, including disputes over employment, property transactions, and contractual breaches. The decisions made in these cases would provide clarity and resolution for the parties involved, upholding the principles of justice and the rule of law.

The court issued judgments and further directions as per the cases scheduled. The outcomes of these hearings and trials would depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented, with the court's decisions expected to provide definitive resolutions to the disputes at hand.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.