Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 27 May 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 27 MAY 2014

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Michael Ronald Burnside
Brady John Magrath

11:30 a.m.
For Plea
Jason Edward Tiedemann

For Facts and Sentence
Jacob Roger Dorloff

For Bail Consent
Trent McSpadden

2:15 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Rebecca Louise Morgan

For Mention via Video-Link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Launceston
Matthew James Coventry

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
BAS
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention via video link

SMK

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Gaye Sansom
v
C McKenzie – Member Anti-Discrimination Tribunal

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of matters on the Hobart law list on 27 May 2014. The court heard pleas and matters for sentencing in the criminal jurisdiction. This included pleas from Michael Ronald Burnside, Brady John Magrath, and Jason Edward Tiedemann. The court also heard matters for sentencing from Jacob Roger Dorloff and Rebecca Louise Morgan.

The legal issues before the court included the assessment of pleas and the determination of appropriate sentences. The court was required to consider the evidence presented and the legal arguments from both the prosecution and the defence. The court also needed to decide on the appropriate sentences, taking into account the nature of the offence, the circumstances of the offender, and any mitigating or aggravating factors.

The court heard arguments from both parties and considered the evidence and legal arguments presented. Justice Tennent presided over the criminal matters, while Justice Porter dealt with the civil matter. The court made decisions based on the merits of each case, taking into account the law and the specific facts of each matter. The court ordered sentences for the offenders, taking into account the nature of the offence and the circumstances of the offender.

The final orders of the court included the acceptance of pleas and the imposition of sentences for the offenders. The court also heard matters relating to bail and the continuation of trials. The court made orders as appropriate, based on the evidence and arguments presented.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established