Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 27 March 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 27 MARCH 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen James Eastley

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Judgment
Johnstone, McGee & Gandy Pty Ltd
v
Hockey Tasmania Incorporated and Ors

In Court
For Trial
Cook
v
Buckingham and anor

Gradco Pty Ltd
v
Buckingham and ors
(part-heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30a.m
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
BPA

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am
For backstop trial
Robin John Jago
Katrina Louise Gregory
For Trial
Anthony Colin Finnegan
(Part heard)

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case between Johnstone, McGee & Gandy Pty Ltd and Hockey Tasmania Incorporated and others. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the provided document. The hearing took place in Hobart before Justice BLOW. The legal issues the court was required to decide involved the dispute between the two parties. The court's reasoning and outcome were not specified in the provided document. Therefore, it is unclear what the final orders of the court were. The case highlights the importance of the Supreme Court of Tasmania in resolving disputes between parties in the state.

The court had to consider the legal arguments presented by both parties and determine the outcome based on the evidence and legal principles. The court's decision would have been based on a thorough analysis of the case and the relevant laws. The outcome of the case would have significant implications for the parties involved and could set a precedent for future cases in the state. The Supreme Court of Tasmania plays a crucial role in ensuring that justice is served and that the rule of law is upheld in the state.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established