Legal Research
Cases
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 26 February 2013

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 26 February 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 24

Criminal Jurisdiction

Civil Jurisdiction

Criminal Law

Civil Litigation & Procedure

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 26 FEBRUARY 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Aaron James Crosswell
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart via video-link to Burnie
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.30 p.m.
For Judgment
JHW

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans

Criminal Jurisdiction

4.30 p.m. via video link
For Judgment
JHW

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details

AGLC: Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 26 February 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 24
Case: [2013] TASSCCourtlist 24
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the matter of Aaron James Crosswell versus the State of Tasmania was heard on the 26th of February 2013. The case was presided over by Justice Evans in Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart. The proceedings were conducted via video link to Burnie, indicating the geographical spread and the court's use of technology to facilitate justice delivery. The dispute involved Aaron James Crosswell, who was seeking a resolution against the State of Tasmania, presumably related to criminal matters.

The legal issues before the court included the interpretation and application of criminal law in the context of Crosswell’s case. The court had to determine whether any legal principles or precedents were misapplied by lower courts, and if the state's actions were justified under the law. The case also likely involved questions regarding the procedural fairness of the criminal proceedings against Crosswell and the adequacy of the state’s response.

Justice Evans delivered the judgment at 4:30 p.m. on the same day. The reasoning and outcome of the case were based on a thorough examination of the evidence presented and the legal arguments advanced by both parties. The court considered the state’s defence, the procedural steps taken, and the implications for the accused. The final orders would reflect the court’s determination on these legal issues, potentially leading to a ruling in favour of either party.

Orders